Choice of Depreciation Method and Assumptions

Choice of Depreciation Method and Assumptions

Financial statements and the ratios derived from them may be significantly impacted by a company’s selected depreciation method and accompanying assumptions and estimates.

Companies should review the estimates used periodically to ensure that they remain reasonable.

The Effect of the Choice of Depreciation Method and Assumptions on Depreciation Expense, Financial Statements, and Financial Ratios

The choice of depreciation method will affect the amounts that are reported on the financial statements, including the amounts for reported assets and operating and net income. Several financial ratios will be affected because of this. Among others, the fixed asset turnover, total asset turnover, operating profit margin, operating return on assets, and return on assets will be affected.

In some countries, the same depreciation method is not used for financial reporting and tax purposes. As a result, pre-tax income on the income statement and taxable income on the tax return are likely to differ. The amount of tax expense computed based on pre-tax income and the amount of taxes actually owed based on taxable income may be different.

For example, a company may use the straight-line method of depreciation for financial reporting and an accelerated depreciation method for tax purposes.  In such an instance, the company’s financial statements will report lower depreciation expense and higher pre-tax income in the first year, compared with the amount of depreciation expense and taxable income in its tax reporting. The tax expense that is calculated based on the financial statements’ pre-tax income will be higher than taxes payable based on taxable income. The difference between the two amounts is a deferred tax liability. This deferred tax liability will be reduced as the difference reverses, i.e., when the depreciation for financial reporting becomes higher than the depreciation for tax purposes and the income tax is paid.

Significant estimates are required for calculating depreciation expenses. These include the useful life of an asset and the expected residual value at the end of that useful life. Longer useful life and a higher expected residual value will decrease the amount of annual depreciation expense relative to a shorter useful life and lower expected residual value.

Question 1

Companies A and B purchase a similar machine at the same time and at the same cost. In reporting this acquisition, company A uses the straight-line method of depreciation, while company B uses the double declining balance method. Other than the choice of depreciation method, both companies use similar estimates and assumptions.

Assuming that the machine is the only long-lived asset that both companies report on their financial statements, which of the following statements is the most accurate?

  1. Company A and B will have the same tax expense.
  2. Company A will have a higher pre-tax income in the first year, than company B.
  3. Company A will have a higher depreciation expense in the first year than company B.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Company A will have a higher pre-tax income in the first year than company B because of its lower depreciation expense under the straight-line method of depreciation.

A is incorrect because company A will have a lower depreciation expense.

C is incorrect because company A will have a higher tax expense in the first year due to its higher pre-tax income.

Question 2

How would an increase in the estimated residual value of an asset affect a company’s net income?

  1. It has no effect.
  2. It would increase net income.
  3. It would decrease net income.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Increasing the residual value would decrease the annual depreciation expense of the asset. Decreasing the depreciation expense of the asset would therefore increase net income.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.