The Value and Return of an Index

The Value and Return of an Index

Every index weighting method has a formula that calculates the weighting of a given constituent security within an index. For the following examples, the same portfolio of three securities will be used to help illustrate the weighting methods. Note that while income from constituent securities could hypothetically be reinvested in the index, the index level adjusts only for price changes.

$$
\begin{array}{l|r|r|r}
\textbf{Security} & \textbf{Beg. Price/Share} & \textbf{Income} & \textbf{End Price/Share} \\
\hline
\text{Security A} & 500 & 0 & 750 \\
\text{Security B} & 20 & 1 & 21 \\
\text{Security C} & 45 & 1 & 25 \\
\hline
\textbf{Total} & & \mathbf{2} & \\
\end{array}
$$

Price Weighting

Here, the weight of each security i is given by:

$$ w_{i}^P = \frac{ P_i } { \sum_{i=1}^{N}{P_i} } $$

Where:

wi = Fraction of the portfolio that is allocated to the security or weight of the security.

N = Number of securities in the index.

Pi = Price of the security.

Example of a price-weighted index

$$
\begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr}
\textbf{Security} & \textbf{Beg. Value} & \textbf{Income} & \textbf{End Value} & \textbf{Shares} & \textbf{Beg. Weight} & \textbf{End Weight} \\
\hline
\text{Security A} & 500 & 0 & 750 & 1 & 88.5\% & 94.2\% \\
\text{Security B} & 20 & 1 & 21 & 1 & 3.5\% & 2.6\% \\
\text{Security C} & 45 & 1 & 25 & 1 & 8.0\% & 3.1\% \\
\hline
\textbf{Total} & \mathbf{188.33} & & \mathbf{265.33} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{1} &\mathbf{1} \\
\textbf{Price Return} & \mathbf{40.9\%} \\
\textbf{Total Return} & \mathbf{41.2\%} \\
\end{array}
$$

One share of each security is held in the index, and the divisor is set to 3 – the total number of shares. The high weighting of Security A in both periods is perhaps the most interesting part of this index. While this is an extremely concentrated index, price/share is nevertheless very important in how securities are weighted in price indices, even though it remains a mostly arbitrary figure.

Equal Weighting

Here, the weight of each security i is given by:

$$ w_{i}^E = \frac{ 1 } { N } $$

Where:

N = Number of securities in the index.

Example of an equal-weighted index

$$
\begin{array}{l|rrrrrr}
\textbf{Security} & \textbf{Beg. Value} & \textbf{Income} & \textbf{End Value} & \textbf{Shares} & \textbf{Beg. Weight} & \textbf{End Weight} \\
\hline
\text{Security A} & 500 & 0 & 750 & 1 & 33.3\% & 48.3\% \\
\text{Security B} & 500 & 25 & 525 & 25 & 33.3\% & 33.8\% \\
\text{Security C} & 500 & 11 & 278 & 11.11 & 33.3\% & 17.9\% \\
\text{Total} & 1,500.00 & 36.11 & 1,552.78 & 37.11 & 100\% & 100\% \\
\hline
\textbf{Price Return} & \mathbf{3.5\%} \\
\textbf{Total Return} & \mathbf{5.9\%} \\
\end{array}
$$

As shown in the table, each of the three securities is equally weighted within the index at the beginning of the period but largely strayed from the initial weights. While the price index posted returns above 40%, returns of the three-security portfolio were much more modest when beginning with the same values.

Market-capitalization

Here, the weight of each security i is given by:

$$ w_{i}^M = \frac{ Q_i P_i } { \sum_{i=1}^{N}{Q_i P_i } } $$

Where:

Qi = Number of shares outstanding of security.

Example of a market-capitalization index

$$
\begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr}
\textbf{Security} & \textbf{Beg. Value} & \textbf{Income} & \textbf{End Value} & \textbf{Out. Shares(mm)} & \textbf{Beg. Weight} & \textbf{End Weight} \\
\hline
\text{Security A} & 1,500 & 0 & 2,250 & 3 & 25.6\% & 46.7\% \\
\text{Security B} & 300 & 15 & 315 & 15 & 5.1\% & 6.5\% \\
\text{Security C} & 4,050 & 90 & 2,250 & 90 & 69.2\% & 46.7\% \\
\text{Total} & 5,850.00 & 105.00 & 4,815.00 & 108.00 & 100\% & 100\% \\
\hline
\textbf{Price Return} & \mathbf{-17.7\%} \\
\textbf{Total Return} & \mathbf{-15.9\%} \\
\end{array}
$$

Note that the column that recorded constituent shares as part of the index portfolio is now equal to millions of outstanding shares. The beginning and ending values now reflect the market capitalizations of the companies in the index portfolio. Since Security C has by far the largest amount of shares outstanding, it accounts for more than two-thirds of market capitalization when multiplied out by the share price at the beginning of the period. As a result of Security C’s heavy weighting, the market-capitalization index performed very poorly during the period.

Float-adjusted Market-capitalization Weighting

Here, the weight of each security i is given by:

$$ w_{i}^{fM} = \frac{ f_i Q_i P_i } { \sum_{i=1}^{N}{f_iQ_i P_i } } $$

Where:

fi = Fraction of shares outstanding in the market float.

Example of a float-adjusted market-capitalization index

$$
\begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr}
\textbf{Security} & \textbf{Beg. Value} & \textbf{Income} & \textbf{End Value} & \textbf{Out. Shares(mm)} & \textbf{Beg. Weight} & \textbf{End Weight} &\textbf{Market Float %} \\
\hline
\text{Security A} & 750 & 0 & 1,125 & 3 & 15.4\% & 31.7\% & 50.0\% \\
\text{Security B} & 270 & 14 & 284 & 15 & 5.5\% & 8.0\% & 90.0\% \\
\text{Security C} & 3,848 & 86 & 2,138 & 90 & 79.0\% & 60.3\% & 95.0\% \\
\text{Total} & 4,867 & 99.00 & 3,546.00 & 108.00 & 100\% & 100\% \\
\hline
\textbf{Price Return} & \mathbf{-27.1\%} \\
\textbf{Total Return} & \mathbf{-25.1\%} \\
\end{array}
$$

To calculate float-adjusted market capitalization, we multiply each market capitalization by its respective fraction of outstanding shares in the market float. Since Security A is more closely held with just 50% market float, its weight is significantly reduced in the float-adjusted index compared to the unadjusted market capitalization index. In this scenario, the index’s performance becomes highly skewed by Security C’s losses during the period.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.