Market Efficiency for Fundamental Analysis

Market Efficiency for Fundamental Analysis

The table below shows if abnormal returns can be earned through various strategies and active management assuming different types of market efficiency.

$$
\begin{array}{l|cccc}
\textbf{} & \textbf{Technical Analysis} & \textbf{Fundamental Analysis} & \textbf{Insider Trading} & \textbf{Active Management} \\
\hline
\textbf{Weak} & \text{No} & \text{Yes} & \text{Yes} & \text{Yes} \\
\textbf{Semi-strong} & \text{No} & \text{No} & \text{Yes} & \text{No} \\
\textbf{Strong} & \text{No} & \text{No} & \text{No} & \text{No} \\
\end{array}
$$

  • Weak Form Efficiency:
    • Technical Analysis: No abnormal returns can be earned because past price information is already reflected in stock prices.
    • Fundamental Analysis: Can potentially earn abnormal returns as past price information is not sufficient; public information may not yet be fully reflected.
    • Insider Trading: Can earn abnormal returns as private information is not reflected in the stock price.
    • Active Management: Can earn abnormal returns if it involves strategies that are not fully captured by past price data.
  • Semi-Strong Form Efficiency:
    • Technical Analysis: No abnormal returns because all publicly available information is already reflected in stock prices.
    • Fundamental Analysis: No abnormal returns because all publicly available information is incorporated into stock prices.
    • Insider Trading: Can still earn abnormal returns as private information is not yet reflected in the stock prices.
    • Active Management: No abnormal returns based on public information as it’s already incorporated into the stock prices.
  • Strong Form Efficiency:
    • Technical Analysis: No abnormal returns as all information (public and private) is reflected in stock prices.
    • Fundamental Analysis: No abnormal returns for the same reason.
    • Insider Trading: No abnormal returns as even private information is reflected in the stock prices.
    • Active Management: No abnormal returns, as all information is reflected in stock prices.

Question

Which of the following statements is most likely true?

  1. In a strong form efficient market, a rational investor would invest in an actively managed fund.
  2. In a weak-form efficient market, active management can outperform passive management net of fees.
  3. In a semi-strong form efficient market, fundamental analysis can earn abnormal returns, but technical analysis cannot.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Active management should be able to outperform passive management gross of fees in a weak-form efficient market. However, its ability to outperform net of fees depends on how high abnormal returns are relative to additional management fees.

A is incorrect. In a strong form efficient market, no rational investor would invest in an actively managed fund since the fund would charge more fees, and pay more transactions costs, without being able to earn abnormal returns.

C is incorrect. Both fundamental analysis and technical analysis cannot earn abnormal returns in a semi-strong efficient market.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.