Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Investm ...
The degree to which investors take geopolitical risk into account when making decisions... Read More
The foreign exchange (FX) market is the world’s largest market, with a daily turnover of approximately USD 6.6 trillion in 2019. It operates 24 hours daily, facilitating international trade and cross-border capital flows with participants from various backgrounds.
Currencies are often referred to by standardized three-letter codes (e.g., USD for US Dollar, EUR for Euro) agreed upon through the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
It is crucial to distinguish between individual currencies and exchange rates. One can possess an individual currency, say, USD 100. On the other hand, an exchange rate is the price of one currency in terms of another.
The exchange rate can be seen as the number of units of one currency (price currency) that one unit of another currency (base currency) will buy. As such, the exchange rate can be viewed as the cost of one unit of the base currency in terms of the price of the currency. For example, EUR/USD refers to the exchange rate between the euro and the US dollar.
Note that the three-letter code can be used to signify an individual currency or an exchange rate. For instance, EUR in a professional FX market is the exchange rate between the euro and the US dollar. As such, it is important to understand the context in which the three-letter codes are used.
To further distance this confusion, the exchange quoting convention is given by “A/B,” which implies the number of units of currency A that one unit of currency B will buy.
Nominal exchange rates are the actual exchange rates in the market, expressed as the price of one currency in terms of another. It is expressed in the convention of “A/B,” referring to the number of units of currency A that one unit of currency B will buy. For example, a USD/EUR exchange rate of 1.1650 means 1 euro will buy 1.1650 US dollars.
The purchasing power parity (PPP) theory suggests that nominal exchange rates adjust to equalize the prices of identical goods in different markets. However, due to factors such as trade barriers, transaction costs, and differences in goods and services, nominal exchange rates often deviate from PPP.
Real exchange rates are indexes constructed by economists and other market analysts to assess changes in the relative purchasing power of one currency compared with another. In other words, real exchange rates adjust nominal rates using price levels in each country to compare relative purchasing power.
The real exchange rate goes up when the nominal exchange rate (how much domestic currency you get for one unit of foreign currency) and the foreign price level increase. It goes down when the domestic price level increases.
As such, the higher the real exchange rate is, the lesser foreign goods, in real terms, an individual can buy, and the lower that individual’s relative purchasing power will be compared with the foreign country.
Mathematically, the real exchange rate is the relative price levels in the domestic and foreign countries. The formula for the real exchange rate between domestic (d) and foreign (f) currencies is given by:
$$ \text{Real exchange rate (d/f)}=\frac{S_{d/f}\times P_f\ }{P_d}=S_{d/f}\times\left(\frac{P_f}{P_d}\right)$$
Where:
\(S_{d/f\ }\)= The spot exchange rate (quoted in terms of the number of units of domestic currency per one unit of foreign currency).
\(P_f\) = The foreign price level quoted in terms of the foreign currency.
\(P_d\)= The domestic price level in terms of the domestic currency.
An analyst is studying the effects of exchange rates on purchasing power. She comes across the following data:
The real exchange rate for an American consumer wanting to buy goods made in the Eurozone is closest to:
We know that:
$$ \text{Real exchange rate (d/f)}=S_{d/f}\times\left(\frac{P_f}{P_d}\right)$$
Therefore, for an American consumer, the real exchange rate is given by:
$$\begin{align}\text{Real exchange rate}\ \left(USD/EUR\right)&=S_{USD/EUR}\times\left(\frac{{CPI}_{EUR}}{{CPI}_{USD}}\right)\\&=1.15\times\frac{110}{100}=1.2650\end{align}$$
The formula for the Change in the real exchange rate, which considers changes in both domestic and foreign price levels and the nominal spot exchange rate, is as follows:
$$\left(1+\frac{\Delta S_{d/f}}{S_{d/f}}\right)\times \frac{\left(1+\frac{\Delta P_f}{P_f}\right)}{\left(1+\frac{\Delta P_d}{P_d}\right)}-1$$
Where:
\(S_{d/f}\) = Spot exchange rate (quoted in terms of the number of units of domestic currency per one unit of foreign currency).
\(∆S_{d/f}\)= Change in spot exchange rate.
\(P_f\) = Foreign price level quoted in terms of the foreign currency.
\(∆P_f\)= Change in foreign price levels.
\(P_d\)= Domestic price level in terms of the domestic currency.
\(∆P_d\)= Change in the domestic price level.
Consider two countries: Canada and the United States of America, where the US is the domestic country. The nominal exchange rate is CAD/USD = 1.25. If the price level in the USA increases by 4% and the price level in Canada increases by 2%, what is the new real exchange rate, assuming the nominal exchange rate remains unchanged?
Price level increase in the USA: 4%
Price level increase in Canada: 5%
Using the formula:
$$\left(1+\frac{\Delta S_{d/f}}{S_{d/f}}\right)\times \frac{\left(1+\frac{\Delta P_f}{P_f}\right)}{\left(1+\frac{\Delta P_d}{P_d}\right)}-1$$
Using the values from the example:
\(\Delta S_{USD/CAD}\ =0\)
\(S_{USD/CAD}=\frac{1}{1.25}=0.8\)
\(\Delta P_{CAD}\) =2%=0.02
\(P_{CAD}\) =100%=1
\(\Delta P_{USD}\) =4%=0.04
\(P_{USD}\)=100%=1
Plugging in the values:
$$\begin{align}&=\left(1+\frac{0}{0.8}\right)\times\left(\frac{1+0.02}{1+0.04}\right)-1\\&=\left(1\right)\times\left(\frac{1.02}{1.04}\right)-1\\ &\approx 0.98077-1=-0.01923\end{align}$$
So, the Change in the real exchange rate is approximately -1.923%, which means the real exchange rate decreased by approximately 1.923%.
A decrease in the real exchange rate means that the value of the domestic currency (in this case, the USD) has decreased relative to the foreign currency (CAD) after adjusting for changes in price levels.
In this example, the price level in Canada (CAD) went up by 2%, while in the United States (USD), it increased by 4%. Although the nominal exchange rate remained the same, the varying inflation rates between the two countries caused the real exchange rate to decline, signifying a real depreciation of the USD concerning the CAD.
This real depreciation of the USD could be due to the higher inflation in the United States compared to Canada. When a country has a higher inflation rate relative to another country, the purchasing power of its currency decreases, which leads to a decrease in the real exchange rate. This is consistent with the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) theory, which suggests that in the long term, exchange rates adjust to equalize the purchasing power of different currencies.
The foreign exchange (FX) market consists of various participants ranging from multi-billion-dollar investment funds to individuals. These participants can be broadly categorized into the buy and sell sides.
Note that the FX market is highly dynamic and complex, with participants having a mix of hedging and speculative motives. In the case of public sector participants, public policy motives may also be a factor. This dynamic and complex interaction of participants and trading objectives makes it difficult to precisely predict movements in FX rates or describe the FX market with simple characterizations.
The global foreign exchange (FX) market encompasses spot transactions, forward transactions, and FX swaps. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) conducts a triennial survey to analyze the size and distribution of global FX market flows.
Exchange rates represent the value of one currency in terms of another and can be quoted in two ways: direct and indirect.
A direct quote involves the domestic currency as the price currency and the foreign currency as the base currency, while an indirect quote is the reverse.
For instance, if we quote the currency exchange rate as A/B, it implies that one unit of currency B buys a certain number of units of currency A. In this case, currency A is the price currency, and B is the base currency.
A direct currency quote considers domestic currency as the price currency and foreign currency as the base currency. For instance, a French investor will view EUR/USD as the direct euro-US dollar exchange rate quoted in terms of the number of euros per dollar. Specifically, if EUR/USD = 1.2310, implies that 1 USD costs 1.2310 EUR.
In the case of the indirect quote, the domestic currency is the base currency, and the foreign currency is the price currency. For instance, the direct quote EUR/USD = 1.2310 has a corresponding indirect tax of 1/ EUR/USD = USD/EUR = 0.8123. It implies that 1EUR costs 0.8113 dollars.
The professional FX market does not use the terms ‘direct’ or ‘indirect’ due to the varying domestic and foreign currencies based on one’s location.
Instead, a set of market conventions has been developed, where major currencies and their exchange rate quote conventions are standardized.
Note that there is always a mix of direct and indirect quotes in common market usage, and a market participant must get familiar with how the conventions are used.
The professional FX market operates on a two-sided price mechanism, which includes banks providing a “bid” (buying price) and an “offer” (selling price) when a client asks for an exchange rate quote. As we already know, exchange rates involve two currencies, and the terms “base currency” and “price currency” clarify the transaction.
The two-sided price reflects buying or selling the base currency:
For instance, consider the bid/offer quote of CHF/EUR = 1.160-1.1622. In this case, the euro (EUR) is the base currency. A quote of 1.1620-1.1622 implies that the client will receive CHF1.1620 for selling EUR1 to the dealer and pay 1.1622 to buy EUR1.
Usually, banks profit by buying currencies at a lower price and selling at a higher price, while electronic FX systems efficiently connect global buyers and sellers, reducing bid/offer spreads due to competition.
The majority of primary spot exchange rates are often expressed to four decimal points. However, the yen is an exception among the main currencies, with its spot exchange rates usually given to just two decimal points. For instance, while a USD/EUR rate might be displayed as 1.1601, a JPY/EUR rate would show as 1311.88.
If the bid/offer quote from the trader were 25.6250–25.6300 INR/USD, then the bid/offer quote in USD/INR terms would be closest to:
The correct answer is A.
An INR/USD quote represents the amount of Indian rupees the trader is bidding (offering) to purchase (sell) USD1. The trader’s bid to buy USD1 at INR25.6250 is similar to the trader handing over INR25.6250 to buy USD1. When you divide both terms by 25.6250, it means the trader is handing over (i.e., selling) INR1 to buy USD0.03902. This becomes the offer in USD/INR terms. The trader is willing to sell INR1 for a price of USD0.03902.
In USD/INR terms, the trader’s bid for INR1 is 0.03901, determined by inverting the offer of 25.6300 in INR/USD terms (1/25.6300 = 0.03901). It’s crucial to remember that in any bid/offer quote, irrespective of the base or price currencies chosen, the bid is always lesser than the offer.
When describing exchange rate changes as a percentage appreciation or depreciation, it’s crucial to determine the price currency and the base currency.
For example, if KSH/USD =145, it implies that one unit of US dollar will buy 145 units of Kenyan shillings. Intuitively, if KSH/USD decreases, it implies that USD costs less or fewer KSH is needed to purchase the USD dollar. In this case, the decline in KSH/USD implies that KSH appreciates against the USD, or, in other words, the USD is depreciating against KSH.
To calculate the percentage change, one must clearly understand the base and price currencies. Take the Chinese Yuan (CNY) and South African Rand (ZAR) example. Assume that the ZAR/CNY exchange rate increased from 1.6459 to 1.8356. Therefore, the percentage appreciation will be:
$$\frac{1.8356}{1.6459}–1=11.5256\%$$
his represents an 11.5256 percent appreciation in the Chinese Yuan against the South African Rand. The ZAR/CNY exchange rate is expressed with the Chinese Yuan as the base currency and the South African Rand as the price currency. In other words, you now need more South African Rands to buy one Chinese Yuan.
The appreciation of the Chinese Yuan against the South African Rand can also be expressed as a depreciation of the South African Rand against the Chinese Yuan. However, in this case, the depreciation percentage will not be equal to the previous appreciation percentage of 11.5256%.
To invert a currency exchange rate, we have to divide 1 by the exchange rate. If
$$ZAR/CNY=1.6459$$
Then,
$$CNY/ZAR=\frac{1}{1.6459}=0.6076$$
To calculate the depreciation percentage of the South African Rand when the exchange rate ZAR/CNY increased from 1.6459 to 1.8356, we need to invert the exchange rate from ZAR/CNY to CNY/ZAR, making the Chinese Yuan the price currency and the South African Rand the base currency. Here’s how you do it:
$$\frac{\frac{1}{1.8356}}{\frac{1}{1.6459}}–1=0.54480.6076-1=-10.3358\%$$
Question
Which of the following best describes a 4% appreciation in the ZAR/CNY exchange rate?
- This represents a 4 percent appreciation in the South African Rand (ZAR) compared to the Chinese Yuan.
- This represents a 4 percent appreciation in the Chinese Yuan (CNY) compared to the South African Rand.
- This represents a 4 percent depreciation in the Chinese Yuan (CNY) compared to the South African Rand.
Solution
The correct answer is B.
A 4% appreciation in the ZAR/CNY exchange rate represents an appreciation of the base currency against the price currency. In this case, the Chinese Yuan appreciates against the South African Rand. Therefore, the appreciation represents a 4 percent increase in the Chinese Yuan relative to the South African Rand.