Competing Stakeholder Interest in Capital Structure Decisions

Competing Stakeholder Interest in Capital Structure Decisions


Capital structure decisions impact stakeholder groups differently. Increased leverage increases the risk to all stakeholders but only results in a higher return for shareholders.

Debt vs. Equity Conflict

Debtholders have a contractual and prior claim to cash flows and firm assets over shareholders. Their potential return is limited. Equity holders have more downside risk but a much higher upside potential. Therefore, debt holders will prefer lower leverage levels. On the other hand, equity holders will prefer higher leverage levels that offer them greater return potential.

Other Debt Considerations

Seniority and Security

In case of default, secured debt lenders are likely to recover more than unsecured lenders. Likewise, senior debt is likely to recover more than subordinated debt. Consequently, secured and senior debt lenders can tolerate management actions that increase leverage.

Long-term vs. Short-term debt

Debtors are exposed to probable changes in a business environment, strategy, and management conduct as time passes.

Safeguard for Debtholders

  • Debt covenants can limit the amount of debt a company can take and limit management actions that increase the risk to debt holders. Positive covenants state what borrowers must do, while negative covenants state what borrowers cannot do.
  • Companies want to keep their credit access and conditions favorable. For this reason, they’ll take steps to retain or improve their creditworthiness if they need to borrow in the future.
  • Financial distress costs can be substantial.

Preferred Shareholders

Preferred shares have debt and equity-like characteristics. They are ranked ahead of common shareholders but after debt holders in terms of security and priority of dividend payments. Failure of a company to pay preferred shareholders dividends is not considered a default. However, it prevents payment of dividends to common shareholders until preferred shares dividends are paid. Issuing preferred shares is less risky to a company’s debt holders and equity holders than issuing debt.

Preferred shareholders are vulnerable to management’s actions that increase financial leverage and risk. This is because they lack the covenant protection that debt holders may have.

Management and Directors

Management and directors are hired to maximize shareholder wealth resulting in the debt/equity conflict. Good compensation should align interests between managers/directors and shareholders.

Question

Which of the following tools are most likely used by debt holders to align a company’s interest to debt holders’ interests?

  1. Compensation.
  2. Debt covenants.
  3. Equity ownership.

Solution

The correct answer is B

Debt covenants are lending agreements between lenders and the borrowing company that are used to align the interest of both parties.

A is incorrect. Compensation aligns the interests between management, directors, and shareholders.

C is incorrect. Equity ownership aligns individuals’ incentives to the interests of a company. It also encourages everyone involved to think long-term, which is key to a company’s success.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.