Risk Management Framework
Risk management is the process in which the level of risk to be... Read More
The computation of mean, variance, and covariance statistics allows portfolio managers to compare the underlying securities’ return-risk characteristics and potential portfolio impact. These metrics are quantitatively determined and rely on historical price or return data. While we can compute the historical profile, this does not necessarily mean the relationship between assets or their return-risk profile will remain the same in the future.
The mean of a set of values or measurements is the sum of all the measurements divided by the sum of all the measurements in the set:
$$ \text{Mean} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}}{n} $$
If we compute the population’s mean, we call it the parametric or population mean, denoted by μ (read “mu”). If we get the mean of the sample, we call it the sample mean, denoted by the x bar.
A population refers to the summation of all the elements of interest to the researcher.
A sample is just a set of elements that represent the population as a whole. By analyzing sample data, we are able to make conclusions about the entire population.
Variance is a measure of dispersion around the mean and is statistically defined as the average squared deviation from the mean. It is noted using the symbol σ².
$$ \sigma^2 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N} (X_{i} – \mu)^2}{N} $$
Where μ is the population mean, and N is the population size.
The standard deviation, σ, is the square root of the variance and is commonly referred to as the volatility of the asset. Essentially, it is a measure of how far, on average, the observations are from the mean. A population’s variance is given by:
The population standard deviation equals the square root of the population variance. The sample variance is given by:
$$ S^2 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N} (X_{i} – \bar{X})^2}{n-1} $$
Where X-bar is the sample mean, and n is the sample size.
Note that the sample standard deviation equals the square root of the sample variance.
Covariance is a measure of how closely two assets move together. In covariance, we focus on the relationship between the deviations of some two variables rather than the deviation from the mean of one variable.
If the means of random variables \(X\) and \(Y\) are known, then the covariance between the two random variables can be determined as follows:
$$ { \hat { \sigma } }_{ xy }=\frac { 1 }{ n } \sum _{ i=1 }^{ n }{ \left( { x }_{ i }-{ \mu }_{ x } \right) } \left( { y }_{ i }-{ \mu }_{ y } \right) $$
If we do not know the means, then the equation changes to:
$$ { \hat { \sigma } }_{ xy }=\frac { 1 }{ n-1 } \sum _{ i=1 }^{ n }{ \left( { x }_{ i }-{ \hat { \mu } }_{ x } \right) } \left( { y }_{ i }-{ \hat { \mu } }_{ y } \right) $$
Correlation is a concept that is closely related to covariance in the following way:
$$ { \rho }_{ xy }=\frac { { \sigma }_{ xy } }{ { \sigma }_{ x }{ \sigma }_{ y } } $$
Correlation ranges between +1 and -1 and is much easier to interpret than covariance. Two variables are perfectly correlated if their correlation is equal to +1. Note that they are uncorrelated if their correlation equals 0 and move in perfectly opposite directions if their correlation equals -1.
Question
In a two-asset portfolio, which combination of assets would result in the most diversified portfolio?
A. Correlation coefficient = 0.75.
B. Correlation coefficient = -0.2.
C. Correlation coefficient = 0.
Solution
The correct answer is B.
A diversified portfolio is produced, and portfolio risk is lowered within a two-asset portfolio by combining negatively correlated assets.