Methods for Investing in Non-domestic ...
Along with the technological advancements in recent decades, it has become significantly easier... Read More
The table below shows if abnormal returns can be earned through various strategies and active management assuming different types of market efficiency.
$$
\begin{array}{l|cccc}
\textbf{} & \textbf{Technical Analysis} & \textbf{Fundamental Analysis} & \textbf{Insider Trading} & \textbf{Active Management} \\
\hline
\textbf{Weak} & \text{No} & \text{Yes} & \text{Yes} & \text{Yes} \\
\textbf{Semi-strong} & \text{No} & \text{No} & \text{Yes} & \text{No} \\
\textbf{Strong} & \text{No} & \text{No} & \text{No} & \text{No} \\
\end{array}
$$
Question
Which of the following statements is most likely true?
- In a strong form efficient market, a rational investor would invest in an actively managed fund.
- In a weak-form efficient market, active management can outperform passive management net of fees.
- In a semi-strong form efficient market, fundamental analysis can earn abnormal returns, but technical analysis cannot.
Solution
The correct answer is B.
Active management should be able to outperform passive management gross of fees in a weak-form efficient market. However, its ability to outperform net of fees depends on how high abnormal returns are relative to additional management fees.
A is incorrect. In a strong form efficient market, no rational investor would invest in an actively managed fund since the fund would charge more fees, and pay more transactions costs, without being able to earn abnormal returns.
C is incorrect. Both fundamental analysis and technical analysis cannot earn abnormal returns in a semi-strong efficient market.