Capital Allocation Pitfalls

Capital Allocation Pitfalls


Some of the common capital allocation pitfalls or mistakes are:

Inertia

By comparing the current capital investment to the amount from the previous year and the return on investment, analysts can determine the presence of inertia. An analyst should evaluate an issuer’s justification for its capital investment. Further, they should consider if the management should contemplate alternate uses if capital spending each year is either stagnant or rising despite declining returns on investment.

Source of Capital Bias

The capital allocation process should be used for all capital investments, whether made using internally produced cash, debt, or equity. Management teams should consider all capital as having an opportunity cost, independent of its source. Some management teams may plan for internally generated cash differently and as if it is “free” from externally raised capital such as equity or debt.

Failing to Consider Investment Alternatives or the Alternative States

The most basic phase in the capital allocation process is the generation of solid investment ideas. In some organizations, however, many good alternatives are never even explored. Furthermore, many businesses overlook different real-world conditions, which should be considered through breakeven, scenario, and simulation analyses.

Pushing Pet Projects

These are projects that influential managers want the company to invest in even though they may not be profitable. Often, managers will exaggerate these projects’ profitability to ensure they are selected.

Basing Investment Decisions on EPS, Net Income, or ROE

Even for those with a high NPV, many investments do not increase earnings per share (EPS), net income, or return on equity (ROE) in the short run. Since managers often have short-term incentives, they may choose projects that do not align to a company’s long-term interests.

Internal Forecasting Errors

Companies may make internal forecasting errors that are hard, if not impossible, for external analysts to spot. Consequently, this might lead to unsuccessful investment results. A common one is using a company’s overall cost of capital rather than an investment’s required rate of return.

Question

Which of the following is most likely a common capital allocation pitfall resulting from stagnant or declining investment returns while increasing capital investments?

  1. Inertia.
  2. Internal forecasting errors.
  3. Basing investment decisions on net income.

The correct answer is A.

This is where a company’s return on investments stays the same or declines despite an increase in capital investments. This could be due to a lack of investment opportunities.

B is incorrect. Internal forecasting errors involve internal mistakes companies make when evaluating investment opportunities. External analysts find it difficult to spot such errors. These errors may lead to investment failure.

C is incorrect. Investment decisions should not be based on EPS, net income, or ROE but NPV. In addition, managers may pick projects that aren’t beneficial to a company in the long run.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.