Constructing Equity Valuation Models Based on Company Characteristics

Constructing Equity Valuation Models Based on Company Characteristics

Company Life-Cycle Stage and Model Selection

A company’s stage of development determines the appropriate valuation approach, key metrics, value drivers, and data availability.

Start-Up Phase

Characteristics:

  • Little to no revenue
  • Negative cash flow
  • No operating history
  • High probability of failure

Valuation Approach:

Start-up valuations forgo near-term cash flow forecasts and focus primarily on the expected terminal value. The valuation model centers on revenue potential rather than earnings-based metrics.

$$ \mathrm{IV}_t = \frac{\text{Expected Firm Revenue} \times \frac{\text{Price}}{\text{Sales Multiple}}}{(1 + \text{Required Rate of Return})^n} $$

Alternatively, using a target return on investment (ROI):

$$ \mathrm{IV}_t = \frac{\text{Expected Firm Revenue} \times \frac{\text{Price}}{\text{Sales Multiple}}}{\text{ROI}} $$

Key Considerations:

  • Terminal value uses price-to-sales multiples, not earnings multiples
  • Denominator reflects the high required returns demanded by venture capital investors
  • ROI targets often exceed 10× over five years or more
  • Pre-money vs. post-money valuation distinctions matter for new equity investments

$$ \text{Pre-money Valuation} = \text{Post-money Valuation} – \text{New Equity} $$

$$ \text{Fractional Ownership} = \frac{\text{New Equity}}{\text{Post-money Valuation}} $$

Growth Phase

Characteristics:

  • Generating revenue and possibly earnings
  • Proven product or service
  • Rapid expansion to capture market opportunities
  • Retaining and reinvesting earnings due to high expected returns

Valuation Approach:

Growth phase valuations incorporate detailed revenue and profit projections to achieve targeted financial results. Unlike start-ups, growth companies focus on earnings-based multiples rather than sales-based multiples.

Key Features:

  • Detailed revenue forecasts with explicit growth assumptions
  • Profit margin projections reflecting economies of scale
  • Asset investment requirements to support expansion
  • Terminal value based on earnings multiples (e.g., P/E)
  • Higher required returns than mature companies (IRR often 30%–40%)$$ \begin{align*} \text{Terminal Value} & = \text{Forecasted Earnings} \times \text{P/E Multiple} \\

    \mathrm{IV}_t &= \frac{\text{Terminal Value}}{\text{ROI}} \end{align*} $$

Mature Phase

Characteristics:

  • Stable revenue growth
  • Sustainable profitability and cash flow
  • Established market position
  • Positive free cash flow

Valuation Approach:

Mature firms are typically valued using:

  • Constant-growth models
  • Stable profit margins
  • Asset growth in line with revenue growth
  • Discount rates reflecting lower risk

Decline Phase

Characteristics:

  • Falling sales and market share
  • Lower profitability
  • Greater likelihood of financial distress
  • Potential restructuring or liquidation

Valuation Approach:

For firms in decline, analysts should explicitly incorporate the probability of financial distress:

$$ \mathrm{IV}_t = \text{Going-Concern Value} \times (1 – \text{Prob }{(\text{Distress})}) + \text{Distress Sale Value} \times \text{Prob}(\text{Distress}) $$

Key Adjustments:

  • Identify and adjust key balance sheet and income statement items affected by decline
  • Recognize that discount rates are difficult to estimate given distress possibilities
  • Avoid terminal value estimates based on non-distressed industry peers

2. Effect of Shareholder Control on Valuation Model Construction

Financial Investors (Non-Controlling):

  • No influence over firm operations
  • Valuation based on how existing management operates the firm
  • Standard discounted cash flow or relative valuation approaches apply

Controlling Investors (Strategic or Activist):

  • Hold significant minority or majority stakes
  • Seek board representation or full control
  • Initiate changes to increase shareholder value

Valuation Implications:

When activist investors propose changes, analysts can translate these into detailed forecasts of operating, investing, and financing activities. This includes modeling:

  • Asset sales or acquisitions
  • Expense reductions or restructurings
  • Changes in capital structure
  • Dividend policy revisions

Example: Growth Company Valuation

NovaTech Solutions is a private technology company founded four years ago. The company provides cloud-based software for small businesses. Base year (Year 4) financials:

$$
\begin{array}{l|r}
\textbf{Item} & \textbf{Year 4 (USD)} \\
\hline
\text{Sales} & 18,500,000 \\ \hline
\text{COGS} & 15,170,000 \\ \hline
\text{Gross Profit} & 3,330,000 \\ \hline
\text{SG&A} & 3,330,000 \\ \hline
\text{Net Income} & 0 \\
\end{array}
$$

Assumptions:

  • 40% annual sales growth over five years
  • COGS and SG&A grow at 28% annually
  • Tax rate: 30%

Step 1: Forecast Year 9 Sales and Net Income

$$ \begin{align*} \text{Sales }{(\text{Year 9})}& = 18,500,000 \times 1.40^5 = 99,497,440 \\
\text{COGS }{(\text{Year 9})} & = 15,170,000 \times 1.28^5 = 52,123,723 \\
\text{SG&A }{(\text{Year 9})} &= 3,330,000 \times 1.28^5 = 11,338,714 \\
\text{Net Income}& = [\text{Sales} – \text{COGS} – \text{SG&A}] \times (1 – \text{Tax Rate}) \\
\text{Net Income} &= (99,497,440 – 52,123,723 – 11,338,714) \times (1 – 0.30) = 25,224,502 \end{align*} $$

Step 2: Estimate Intrinsic Value

Industry peers trade at P/E = \(18\times\). Target ROI = \(4\times\) over five years.

$$ \begin{align*} \text{Terminal Value} &= 25,224,502 \times 18 = 454,041,038 \\
\mathrm{IV}_0 &= \frac{454,041,038}{4} = 113,510,260 \end{align*} $$

Question

A valuation model for a company in the start-up phase of its life cycle is most likely based on a P/S multiple using expected:

  1.  sales in the next year.
  2. sales at the end of the forecast horizon.
  3. earnings at the end of the forecast horizon.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Start-up companies generate little to no revenue and negative cash flow, with no operating history. Valuation focuses on future revenue potential rather than earnings, and the terminal value should reflect sales at the end of the expected growth phase, not in the next year.

A is incorrect. The next year’s sales do not capture the full revenue growth potential of a start-up company. The valuation horizon must extend to the point where the company achieves meaningful scale.

C is incorrect. Start-ups typically have negative or negligible earnings in early phases. An earnings-based multiple yields a negative or meaningless valuation. Sales-based multiples are more appropriate.

Start Free Trial →

Strengthen your understanding of equity valuation models, company characteristics, and valuation approaches in CFA Level I Equity with study notes, practice questions, and mock exams.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.

    Get Ahead on Your Study Prep This Cyber Monday! Save 35% on all CFA® and FRM® Unlimited Packages. Use code CYBERMONDAY at checkout. Offer ends Dec 1st.