Working Capital, Capital Investments, and Capital Structure

Working Capital, Capital Investments, and Capital Structure

Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)

Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) is a metric of shareholder value, representing the actual cash left over after a company covers its operating expenses, taxes, and all necessary investments to sustain and grow the business.

$$ \text{FCFE}=\text{Net Income}+\text{Depreciation & Amortization}-\Delta \text{Working Capital}-\Delta \text{Long Term Assets}+\Delta \text{Debt} $$

Where,

$$ \Delta \text{Working Capital} = \Delta \text{Current assets} – \Delta \text{Current liabilities} $$

and

$$ \text{Net debt issuance} (\Delta \text{Debt}) = \text{Additional borrowing} – \text{Debt repayment} $$

Example

TechCorp had the following financial figures for the year:

  • Net Income: $500,000
  • Depreciation & Amortization (D&A): $80,000
  • Working Capital: Increased by $30,000
  • Capital Expenditures: Spent $150,000 on new machinery
  • Net Debt: They issued a new loan of $100,000 and paid off $40,000 of old debt

The Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) can be calculated as:

$$ \begin{align*} \text{FCFE} &=\text{Net Income}+\text{Depreciation & Amortization}-\Delta \text{Working Capital}-\Delta \text{Long Term Assets}+\Delta \text{Debt} \\
&=\$500,000+\$80,000-\$30,000-\$150,000+\$100,000-\$40,000
&=\$460,000
\end{align*} $$

After TechCorp paid its bills, reinvested in new machinery, managed its inventory, and adjusted its debt, it has exactly $460,000 left that could theoretically be paid out to its shareholders.

Net income, non-cash expenses (D&A), and new debt issuance are cash sources, while growth/investments in working capital and long-term assets are cash uses.

Startups and growth firms often have negative FCFE because their massive, required capital investments outpace their early revenues. As companies mature, investment needs slow down, cash flows stabilize, and FCFE turns positive.

Working Capital

Working capital represents short-term operational liquidity. The efficiency with which a firm converts raw materials and resources into cash is measured by the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC):

$$ \text{Cash Conversion Cycle}=\text{Days of Inventory on Hand}+\text{Days Sales Outstanding}-\text{Days Payable Outstanding} $$

Example

Bella’s Boutique, a retail clothing store, has the following figures for the year:

  • Days of Inventory on Hand: 45 days
  • Days Sales Outstanding: 20 days
  • Days Payable Outstanding: 35 days

The cash conversion cycle can be calculated as:

$$\begin{align*} \text{Cash Conversion Cycle} &=\text{Days of Inventory on Hand}+\text{Days Sales Outstanding}-\text{Days Payable Outstanding} \\
&=45+20-35=30 \text{ days} \end{align*} $$

A Cash Conversion Cycle of 30 days means that, on average, the business has cash tied up in operations for 30 days from the moment they pay their suppliers to the moment they collect cash from their customers.

The retail industry focuses on rapidly moving finished goods and collecting cash quickly. Some efficient retailers maintain negative working capital, i.e., collecting cash from customers before they even have to pay their suppliers, which acts as a free source of funding.

The manufacturing industry faces longer, more complex, and highly capital-intensive production cycles. Production hiccups such as design or supply issues can trap cash in ballooning inventories, severely dragging down efficiency.
The Tech/Software industry operates with low working capital requirements because they hold zero physical inventory. Their metrics focus entirely on managing receivables and payables.

Capital Investments (Long-Term Assets)

Working capital covers short-term operational needs, but investments in long-term fixed assets are capitalized and gradually expensed over time through depreciation and amortization (D&A). Analysts look at net capital expenditure (Capex), i.e. Total Capex less D&A, to measure how much a firm is expanding its core productive capacity.

Heavy manufacturers require massive tangible asset bases. Service and software firms leverage tiny physical asset bases, holding primarily intangible assets such as intellectual property or software licenses that are amortized over their useful life.

Analysts evaluate Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) to check if long-term capital investments are generating wealth.

$$ \text{ROIC}=\frac {\text{NOPAT}}{\text{Average Invested Capital}} $$

If a firm’s ROIC is greater than its WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital), the company is successfully generating value for its investors.

Example

The following are the financial figures for Iron Gym for the year:

  • Operating Profit (EBIT): $150,000
  • Tax Rate: 20%
  • Invested Capital (Beginning of Year): $480,000
  • Invested Capital (End of Year): $520,000The ROIC can be calculated as:

    $$ \begin{align*}

    \text{NOPAT} &=\text{Operating Profit}\times (1-\text{Tax Rate}) \\

    \text{NOPAT} &=150,000 \times 1-0.20=\$120,000 \\

    \text{Average Invested Capital} &=480,000+520,0002=\$500,000 \\

    \text{ROIC} &=\frac {120,000}{500,000}=0.24=24\% \end{align*}

The company’s WACC is 18% meaning that the Gym is generating value for its investors because the ROIC is greater than its WACC.

Capital Structure & Financial Leverage

A firm’s optimal mix of debt and equity depends heavily on its business risk and life-cycle stage. Early-stage firms are funded almost exclusively by equity due to erratic cash flows. Mature firms with stable, predictable earnings can safely support debt. The impact of debt on shareholder returns is measured by the Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL).

$$ \text{Degree of Financial Leverage} =\frac {\%\Delta \text{Net Income}}{\% \Delta \text{Operating Income}} $$

Example

FD retail store has the following financial figures for the year:

Year 1

Operating Profit: $200,000

Net Income: $100,000

Year 2

Operating Profit: $400,000

Net Income: $300,000

The degree of financial leverage can be calculated as:

\begin{align*}
\text{Degree of Financial Leverage} &= \frac{\%\Delta \text{Net Income}}{\%\Delta \text{Operating Income}} \\[10pt]
&= \frac{(300000 – 100000) / 100000}{(400000 – 200000) / 200000} = \frac{2}{1} = 2.0
\end{align*}

FD’s degree of financial leverage is 2 means that a 1% change in operating income results in a 2% change in net income.

Higher interest expenses increase financial leverage. This magnifies earnings on the upside but drastically accelerates losses on the downside, increasing the risk of financial distress.

Large corporate acquisitions are frequently funded by massive tranches of debt, spiking a firm’s leverage ratios and lowering interest coverage. Analysts must thoroughly scrutinize management’s concrete plan to pay down this debt and reduce leverage post-merger.

Question

A mature manufacturing company finances a major acquisition with a substantial amount of new debt. Management expects stable earnings to support the increased leverage while gradually reducing debt over the next several years. Which factor should an analyst most likely evaluate when assessing whether the acquisition is likely to enhance shareholder value?

  1. Whether depreciation expense increases following the acquisition.
  2. Whether the company reports positive EBITDA immediately after the acquisition.
  3. Whether management has a credible plan to reduce leverage after the acquisition.

The correct answer is C.

Large acquisitions often increase leverage significantly, reducing interest coverage and increasing financial risk. Analysts should carefully evaluate whether management has a realistic plan to reduce debt and restore an appropriate capital structure after the acquisition.

B is incorrect. Positive EBITDA alone does not demonstrate that the company can comfortably service its debt or successfully reduce leverage.

A is incorrect. Higher depreciation may result from acquiring additional assets, but it does not directly indicate whether the firm’s capital structure is sustainable or whether shareholder value will improve.

Start Free Trial →

Build your understanding of working capital, capital investments, capital structure, and CFA Level I Equity concepts with study notes, practice questions, and mock exams.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.

    Get Ahead on Your Study Prep This Cyber Monday! Save 35% on all CFA® and FRM® Unlimited Packages. Use code CYBERMONDAY at checkout. Offer ends Dec 1st.