Recording Business Transactions
An accounting system allows a company to translate its business activities into usable... Read More
Management’s choices to achieve desired financial results often leave discernible evidence akin to tracks in sand or snow. The warning signs of potential information manipulation in financial reports are directly tied to the fundamental methods of manipulation: biased revenue recognition and biased expense recognition. These biases can manifest in the timing or the location of recognition.
An example of time-related manipulation is expense capitalization, which decreases the expenses of the current period and distributes the cost over several upcoming periods. Location-related manipulations could be made by misallocating losses, i.e., deducting them from other comprehensive income or even directly from equity rather than net income.
Revenue is the largest figure on the income statement and is often manipulated or subject to fraud. Simply checking if revenue is higher or lower than the previous period is not enough. Several analytical procedures can help identify potential red flags:
These steps help ensure that revenue figures are reliable and reflect true economic performance.
While not every company has inventory as part of its asset base, those that do present the potential for accounting manipulation.
Improper capitalization can significantly misstate financial results. As such, analysts should:
While net income influences stock prices, cash flow is essential for covering expenses. Management may manipulate either, but ultimately, net income must translate into cash for the company to remain sustainable. A discrepancy where net income exceeds cash provided by operations could indicate that current expenses are being deferred through aggressive accrual accounting policies. Increasing earnings alongside declining cash from operations may be a warning of accounting issues.
As such, an analyst should create a time series comparing cash generated by operations to net income. If this ratio is consistently below 1.0 or shows a declining trend, it may suggest issues with the company’s accrual accounts.
Several indicators may suggest the need for further analysis in assessing a company’s financial health:
A company’s culture is an intangible factor that investors should consider when evaluating financial statements for potential accounting manipulation. While a highly competitive mentality in management can be beneficial for business operations, it should not extend to communications with shareholders. Such a mindset can lead to accounting manipulations, as seen in early 21st-century corporate scandals. Investors should assess whether this mentality influences the preparation of financial statements.
Research suggests that a predisposition to earnings manipulation may be more likely when the CEO and board chair positions are held by the same person or when the audit committee lacks financial reporting sophistication and independence. The current financial reporting environment should ideally penalize CEOs who endorse using financial reporting discretion to artificially smooth earnings.
Sometimes, a company’s stock price rises after it announces a significant restructuring or impairment charge. The conventional wisdom is that this signals management’s readiness to discard underperforming segments and focus on more profitable activities. However, analysts should recognize that the events leading to such charges did not occur overnight.
Restructuring or impairment charges indicate that prior years’ expenses were likely understated, even if no improper financial manipulation occurred. To accurately extrapolate historical earnings trends, analysts should consider making pro forma adjustments to prior years’ earnings to reflect a fair allocation of the latest restructuring and impairment charges.
Analysts should need to scrutinize companies with aggressive acquisition strategies rigorously. For instance, Tyco International Ltd. acquired over 700 companies from 1996 to 2002. A growth-at-any-cost corporate culture, even with the best intentions, poses severe challenges to operational and financial reporting controls. In Tyco’s case, the SEC found that it consistently understated assets acquired, hence lowering future depreciation and amortization charges and overstated liabilities assumed, avoiding expense recognition and potentially increasing future earnings.
In conclusion, warning signals should be evaluated collectively, not in isolation. The presence of multiple warning signs should prompt investors to approach the investee company with caution or consider alternative investments
Question 1
If a company’s revenue increases faster than the industry growth rate, even though the product quality has been decreasing and the product price has been increasing relative to the competitors’ product prices, which of the following should an analyst most likely examine?
- The trend of change in accounts receivable.
- The companys’ revenue recognition policies.
- Both the trend of change in accounts receivable and the company’s revenue recognition policies.
Solution
The correct answer is C.
An increasing trend of accounts receivable could indicate that a company might be lowering its credit issuance restrictions to generate more sales. Unfortunately, this could affect the uncollectible debt ratio and result in low earnings quality. Still, the company could also be involved in channel stuffing, making its revenues seem inflated.
Question 2
Which of the following most likely indicates that a company is taking advantage of accrual accounting policies to shift current expenses to later periods?
- The ratio of cash flow from operations to net income is consistently > 1.
- The ratio of cash flow from operations to net income is consistently = 1.
- The ratio of cash flow from operations to net income is consistently < 1.
Solution
The correct answer is C.
A consistently less than one ratio signals that a company may use aggressive accounting policies to shift current expenses to later periods to make its current financial position attractive.
A and B are incorrect. They would not signal any accounting manipulation.