Investment Action Evaluation

Investment Action Evaluation

We will use an example to illustrate investment action evaluation for joint ventures, acquisitions, and equity investments.

De Monte

De Monte is a company that makes and sells vintage brandy and cognac. For the past five years, the company has been experiencing a decline in its sales due to increased competition from emerging brandy and cognac distillers in France. Nevertheless, strong pricing and customer loyalty have made  De Monte’s revenues more stable. De Monte is dominant in France as the leading brandy and cognac distiller, with returns on invested capital exceeding 32% and operating margins exceeding 34%.

Two events have occurred in recent years that have challenged De Monte’s market dominance.

  1. Reduced excise duty on imported brandy from other countries.
  2. Global demand for copper ore has increased, leading to a sharp increase in the cost of constructing copper stills used to manufacture cognac.

At the year-end of 20X3, De Monte announced they had closed a $ 1.1 billion investment in Caprice Ltd, a canned cocktail manufacturer based in the UK. The investment in Caprice Ltd will enable De Monte diversify the concentrated cognac industry and increase revenue. De Monte’s investment in Caprice Ltd represents a 40% interest in the company, valuing the company at 3.8 billion on an enterprise value basis.

De Monte will finance the transaction using borrowings from its credit facility with an interest rate of 5% and expects to maintain an investment-grade credit rating. Caprice does not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future and will use proceeds from its transaction to market its products. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 present a summary of historical and forecasted financial data for De Monte and Caprice Ltd. De Monte expects amortization expense associated with the transaction, related to fair value adjustments of $9 million per annum.

$$ \textbf{Exhibit 1 De Monte Summary Financial Data (USD Millions)} \\ \begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c} & \textbf{20X1} & \textbf{20X2} & \textbf{20X3} & \textbf{20X4} \\ \hline \text{Net revenues} & 46,850 & 47,101 & 46,820 & 46,920 \\ \hline \text{EBITDA} & 10,656 & 11,192 & 11,829 & 12,021 \\ \hline \text{EBIT} & 10,406 & 10,928 & 11,529 & 11,820 \\ \hline {\text{Interest expense} } & (885) & (984) & (980) & (980) \\ \hline \text{Income tax} & (2380) & (2486) & (2637) & (2710) \\ \hline \text{Net income} & 7,141 & 7,428 & 8,182 & 8,130 \\ \hline \text{Diluted EPS} & 2.8 & 3.2 & 3.4 & 3.6 \\ \hline { \text{Diluted shares outstanding}} & 2550 & 2321.25 & 2406.47 & 2258.3 \\ \hline \text{Total debt} & 14,487 & 15,981 & 15,996 & 15,996 \\ \hline { \text{Cash &cash equivalents}} & 6,787 & 6,659 & 3,343 & 4,000 \end{array} $$

$$ \textbf{Exhibit 2 Caprice Ltd. Summary Financial Data (USD Millions)} \\ \begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c} & \textbf{20X1} & \textbf{20X2} & \textbf{20X3} & \textbf{20X4} \\ \hline \text{Net revenues} & 500 & 620 & 870 & 1,160 \\ \hline \text{EBITDA} & (250) & (300) & (400) & (650) \\ \hline \text{EBIT} & (250) & (420) & (470) & (550) \\ \hline \text{Interest expense} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline \text{Income tax} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline \text{Net income} & (250) & (420) & (470) & (550) \\ \hline \text{Diluted EPS} & (0.34) & (0.58) & (0.65) & (0.76) \\ \hline \text{Diluted shares outstanding} & 720 & 720 & 720 & 720 \end{array} $$

Questions

  1. Which other action could De Monte take concerning Caprice to achieve the same objectives?

    Solution

    De monte can achieve the same objective either through an acquisition or a joint venture action.

  2. Which benefit would De Monte enjoy if it acquired Caprice Ltd instead of making an equity investment in the company?

    Solution

    By acquiring Caprice, De Monte can exercise control over the company, effectively stopping Caprice from entering into partnerships with competitors.

  3. From the case above, what is the most likely motivation for De Monte’s equity investment in Caprice Ltd?

    Solution

    De Monte is looking to diversify away from the saturated brandy and cognac manufacturing industry after increased competition reduced its sales and profits. The canned cocktail industry has been on an upward trend, and De Monte believes its investment in Caprice Ltd will have a positive return.

  4. Based on the information from exhibits 1 and 2, the effect of the transaction on De Monte’s diluted EPS and debt-to-EBITDA is closest to? Assume De Monte maintained its tax rate.

    Solution

    $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c|c} & \textbf{20X4} & \textbf{Investment} & \textbf{After} \\ & \textbf{Before} & & \textbf{Investment} \\ & \textbf{Investment} & & \\ \hline & \text{20X4} & \text{20X4} & \text{20X4} \\ \hline \text{Net revenues} & 46,920 & & 46,920 \\ \hline {\text{Income from} \\ \text{associates}} & & (229) & (229) \\ \hline \text{EBITDA} & 12,021 & (229) & 11,792 \\ \hline \text{EBIT} & 11,820 & (229) & 11,591 \\ \hline \text{Interest expense} & (980) & (55) & (1,035) \\ \hline \text{Income tax} & (2710) & 71 & (2,639) \\ \hline \text{Net income} & 8,130 & (213) & 7,917 \\ \hline \text{Diluted EPS} & 3.6 & & 3.51 \\ \hline {\text{Diluted shares} \\ \text{outstanding} } & 2258.3 & & 2258.3 \\ \hline \text{Total debt} & 15,996 & 1,100 & 17,096 \\ \hline {\text{Cash &cash} \\ \text{equivalents} } & 4,000 & & 4,000 \\ \hline \text{Debt to EBITDA} & 1.33 & & 1.45 \end{array} $$

    The income from associates is calculated by multiplying the net income from Caprice in 20X4 by De Monte’s 40% investment in Caprice. This represents the share of Caprice’s profits that De Monte is entitled to. So, (40% × -550= -220) then we add the $ 9 million annual amortization to get -229.

    The diluted EPS decreased from 3.6 to 3.51, while the debt-to-EBITDA increased from 1.33 to 1.45 because of the debt-financed equity investment in Caprice.

  5. Suppose De Monte opens a joint venture with Caprice Ltd called Monte Caprice Ltd that will operate in the UK and specialize in canned Gin and Tonic cocktails. What benefit will De Monte gain from this joint venture?

    Solution

    Because Caprice and De Monte have governance representation in Monte Caprice Ltd, the risk to De Monte will be greatly reduced.

Reading 21: Corporate Restructuring

LOS 21 (e) Evaluate corporate investment actions, including equity investments, joint ventures, and acquisitions.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.