Assessing Tax Efficiency through Post-Tax Returns

Assessing Tax Efficiency through Post-Tax Returns

Tax-efficient strategies are those that sacrifice less return to a tax loss. Managers should always seek to provide the best after-tax returns possible, for any given client.

Tax-Efficiency of Various Asset Classes and Investment Strategies

The following return measures are used in analyzing the tax efficiency of an investment:

  • After-tax holding period returns.
  • After-tax post-liquidation returns.
  • After-tax excess returns.
  • Tax-efficiency ratio.

After-tax Holding Period Returns

Pre-tax return = Holding period return (“HPR”)

\(\text{HPR} = \frac { (\text{Ending value} – \text{beginning value} + \text{income}) }{ \text{Beginning value} }\)

The after-tax return builds on the pre-tax return by simply adding in taxes.

\(\text{After-tax return} = \frac { (\text{Ending value} – \text{beginning value} + \text{income} – \text{taxes}) }{ \text{Beginning value}} \)

Taxes are calculated by adding together the individual components and their relative tax burdens.

After-Tax Post-Liquidation Returns

An after-tax post-liquidation return simply computes a return that includes unrealized losses. Unrealized losses are those positions that have appreciated in value such that a tax payment will be due upon their sale. This is the case with many older positions in a portfolio which have a ‘built-in capital gain’. When this amount is calculated it will give the manager a sense of what the actual after-tax return will be. Candidates will need to use the formula for capital gains, and also the formula above for holding period return in conjunction.

Assume that a portfolio has embedded capital gains equal to 20% of holdings, and a capital gains rate of 10%. What is the post-liquidation return over the 3-year period?

$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c}
& \textbf{Pre-tax Return} & \textbf{After-tax Return} \\ \hline
\bf{\text{Year } 1} & 3.5\% & 3.0\% \\ \hline
\bf{\text{Year } 2} & 11\% & 10\% \\ \hline
\bf{\text{Year } 3} & 5.5\% & 4.75\%
\end{array} $$

Step one: calculate after-tax cumulative return: \((1+0.03)(1+0.10)(1+0.0475) = 1.187\)

Step two: subtract the embedded gains: \(1.187 – 0.02 = 1.167\). (The 0.02 is equal to 20% gains multiplied by a 10% tax rate.)

Step three: find the annualized return: \(1.167^{\left(\frac {1}{3}\right)} = 5.28\%\)

This compares to the 6.62% return for the pre-tax return. This information will be useful in the upcoming tax-efficiency ratio but is also informative by itself. Using this number may help managers get a more realistic idea of the amount of cash that could be raised by an investor who has embedded capital gains.

After-Tax Excess Returns

After-tax excess return = After-tax return of the portfolio – the after-tax return of the benchmark

Calculating the after-tax excess return allows managers to determine if the portfolio performed well enough to offset the tax burden experienced by the investor. For passive portfolios, an index is used as the benchmark. If the mandate is active, then managers must create an index of comparable active managers (a manager universe), to make their final determination.

Tax Efficiency Ratio

The tax efficiency ratio (“TER”) is after-tax return divided by pre-tax return.

\(\text{TER} =\frac {\text{After-Tax Return} }{ \text{Pre-Tax Return}} \)

TER can help managers analyze investments, and inform managers about which may be right for each client, and in what account(s). For example, a fund with high returns but with lower TER may be a good fit for a risk-seeking client, only in their tax-advantaged accounts. A fund with a higher TER would be more suitable for taxable accounts.

Question

Assume that a portfolio has embedded capital gains equal to 30% of holdings, and a capital gains rate of 10%. What is the tax efficiency ratio?

$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c}
& \textbf{Pre-tax Return} & \textbf{After-tax Return} \\ \hline
\bf{\text{Year } 1} & 3.5\% & 3.0\% \\ \hline
\bf{\text{Year } 2} & 11.0\% & 10.0\% \\ \hline
\bf{\text{Year } 3} & 5.5\% & 4.75\%
\end{array} $$

  1. 1.33.
  2. 0.80.
  3. 0.75.

Solution:

The correct answer is: C.

Step one: calculate after-tax cumulative return: \((1+0.03)(1+0.10)(1+0.0475) = 1.187\)

Step two: subtract the embedded gains: \(1.187 – 0.03 = 1.157\)

Step three: find the annualized return: \(1.157^{\frac{1}{3}} = 4.98\%\)

This compares to the 6.62% return for the pre-tax return. The pre-tax return is 6.62%, while the after-tax return is 4.98% and since the TER is calculated as:

\(\text{TER} =\frac {\text{After-Tax Return} }{ \text{Pre-Tax Return}}\)

We substitute: \(\frac {4.98\% }{ 6.62\%} = 0.75\)

A and B are incorrect. Answer choice A inverts the pre- and after-tax returns, and answer choice B uses the same data from the summary, candidates must read the question carefully and realize that the embedded capital gains have increased in the follow-up question to 30%. 

Reading 8: Topics in Private Wealth Management

Los 8 (d) Analyze the impact of taxes on capital accumulation in taxable, tax-exempt, and tax-deferred accounts

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.